What is it about?
In this article, based on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, with women who were being discharged from a public hospital after childbirth, we explain that most of them talked about the mistreatment that they experienced uneventfully. Philosophers have described these forms of resignation as adaptive preference, that is, “the preference to put up with abuse” in response to restricted options among the structurally deprived (Nussbaum 2001). Only women who feared for their lives or who realized they were being neglected developed a greater capacity to critically reflect the coercive circumstances that could eventually cause them to die, to understand that their survival depended on hospital personnel, and to develop an autonomous rejection of obstetric violence.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
By examining the differential socioeconomic position between women and providers, and other issues related to social exclusion, we can explain, for the first time in the literature of obstetric violence, why most women accepted with endurance the poor quality of care that they received.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Obstetric Violence as Reproductive Governance in the Dominican Republic, Medical Anthropology, November 2018, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1512984.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page