What is it about?

In this article, based on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, with women who were being discharged from a public hospital after childbirth, we explain that most of them talked about the mistreatment that they experienced uneventfully. Philosophers have described these forms of resignation as adaptive preference, that is, “the preference to put up with abuse” in response to restricted options among the structurally deprived (Nussbaum 2001). Only women who feared for their lives or who realized they were being neglected developed a greater capacity to critically reflect the coercive circumstances that could eventually cause them to die, to understand that their survival depended on hospital personnel, and to develop an autonomous rejection of obstetric violence.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

By examining the differential socioeconomic position between women and providers, and other issues related to social exclusion, we can explain, for the first time in the literature of obstetric violence, why most women accepted with endurance the poor quality of care that they received.

Perspectives

Scenes of violence against women during childbirth occur frequently around the world and result from a larger context of social exclusion and discrimination against women. Maternal deaths abound when health care systems are characterized by the lack of continuum of care, the lack of accountability to women, and the withholding of care. Clinical staff learn to operate within the structural limitations of health care systems by not assuming the responsibility of the continuum of care that each woman needs, and that this discharge of accountability is at the heart of how health professionals can navigate, tolerate, and perpetuate the structure of the system and, in so doing, create the breeding ground for violence against women to occur in health facilities. We need more human rights-based advocacy approaches that protect women in labor when none exist, to monitoring human rights standards, and to creating accountability measures within health systems to prevent violence against women in health facilities, also known as obstetric violence when it involves women during childbirth. To ensure optimal health outcomes, obstetric violence needs to be understood and addressed as a key driver of adverse and inequitable health outcomes, given that it can contribute to differential health outcomes through the provision of substandard care and outright neglect. We need to eliminate obstetric violence to achieve the right to health and health care.

Dr. Arachu Castro
Tulane University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Obstetric Violence as Reproductive Governance in the Dominican Republic, Medical Anthropology, November 2018, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1512984.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page