What is it about?

This study looks at how local philanthropy has developed in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina between 2015 and 2022. Instead of focusing on how much money was donated, we examined the relationships created when donors repeatedly supported particular beneficiaries. We mapped these connections as networks to see whether local giving was becoming more connected, collaborative, or concentrated. We found that connections increased in much of the philanthropic ecosystem, but they also became increasingly centered around a smaller number of important organizations. At the same time, tightly connected groups of donors and beneficiaries did not become more common. This suggests that local philanthropy may be growing while also becoming more dependent on a relatively small number of central actors.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Local philanthropy is becoming increasingly important in the Western Balkans as international funding declines. Our findings show that simply increasing local giving does not necessarily create a diverse and resilient philanthropic ecosystem. When relationships become concentrated around a small number of well-connected organizations, established actors may gain efficiency and visibility, but smaller and newer groups can become harder for donors to reach. This matters because these grassroots organizations often represent communities and causes that larger organizations may overlook. Understanding how philanthropic networks are structured can help donors, policymakers, and civil society organizations encourage local giving while also making sure that funding opportunities remain open to a wider range of organizations.

Perspectives

What interested me most in this research was the idea that the health of philanthropy cannot be understood simply by looking at how much money is donated. The relationships between donors and beneficiaries also matter. A philanthropic sector can become larger and more connected while at the same time becoming increasingly dependent on a few central organizations. I hope this paper encourages donors, civil society organizations, and policymakers to think about the structure of local giving as well as its volume, and particularly about how smaller and less visible organizations can remain part of the philanthropic ecosystem.

Dr. Marko Galjak

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Centralization of local philanthropy: a social network analysis of donor–beneficiary ties in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, August 2026, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2026.2716929.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page