What is it about?
p73, unlike its tumor-suppressor family member p53, is not mutated in cancers. TAp73 exhibits both growth inhibitory and promoting properties, though the mechanistic basis for differential regulation is unclear. We identified an alternate functional region in TAp73β at the C-terminus, which is required for selective activation of targets involved in growth and migration, and mediates FAK activation. This is distinct from the currently known functional region at the N-terminus, similar to that found in p53, and which activates growth-inhibitory targets. DNAJA1, identified as a TAp73β C-terminal binding partner, selectively participates in the activation of targets involved in promoting cellular growth and migration. These data together provide important insights into the mechanistic basis for TAp73’s dual role.
Featured Image
Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash
Why is it important?
As a homolog of the p53 family genes, TAp73 was collectively believed to be as a tumor suppressor alike p53. However, it is also frequently found to be overexpressed in cancers instead of being mutated, raising the controversy on its real role in tumorigenesis. Results from mouse models also exhibit conflicting phenotypes reported by different research laboratories, and thus it is of significance for scientific and biomedical researches to resolve these inconsistencies. The findings from this paper identified a previously unknown functional domain on top of the one resembling to p53, demonstrating that TAp73 has evolved to have two different functional units to promote or inhibit cell growth and motility in context-dependent manner. These results not only provide a possible explanation to the controversy on TAp73 function, and also highlight the complexity of gene regulation of p53 family members.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Dichotomous transactivation domains contribute to growth inhibitory and promotion functions of TAp73, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, May 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2318591121.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page