What is it about?
Species that occupy larger geographic ranges tend to have broader climatic niches and are more likely to achieve high local abundances. These findings provide key insights into species’ vulnerability to environmental change and the processes that structure biodiversity at global scales.
Featured Image
Photo by Dulcey Lima on Unsplash
Why is it important?
A longstanding question in ecology asks whether or not species that achieve large geographic ranges also have large climatic niche breadths. Moroever, understanding the laws that determine species distributions is essential for predicting how plant species will respond to climate change. Our findings indicate that latitudinal and elevational gradients in range size arise from selective pressures and species sorting based on climatic tolerance. Additionally, we show that species with larger range sizes tend to be ecologically dominant, supporting a long-suspected connection between range size, niche breadth, and local and regional abundance. Our results suggest a spectrum of dominance, where species with extensive geographic ranges and broader climatic tolerances tend to be more abundant. We posit that the relationship between range size, niche breadth, and ecological dominance is an emergent macroecological pattern that can be used for understanding and predicting the impacts of climate change on species distributions.
Perspectives
Our findings enable us to carry out fine-scale, quantitative assessments of biodiversity, mapping species’ ranges and distributions without the enormous time and cost of traditional field surveys. As climates change, deforestation and habitat loss accelerate around the globe, understanding how plant life has evolved and how it will respond in the future is essential.
Gabriel Moulatlet
University of Arizona
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: General laws of biodiversity: Climatic niches predict plant range size and ecological dominance globally, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, November 2025, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2517585122.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







