What is it about?
This study looks at how exposure to infectious diseases in childhood can affect health and lifespan later in life. I focus on hookworm, a parasitic infection that was once very common in the southern United States. Using historical records from the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission’s early 20th-century deworming campaign, I compared people who grew up in areas with higher versus lower hookworm exposure, before and after a major de-worming campaign. The analysis shows that children who received deworming treatment before age five lived longer as adults—gaining about 2.5 months of life on average—and also showed better health in midlife, with fewer allergies, lower inflammation, and stronger nutritional markers.
Featured Image
Photo by Ivan Ivanovič on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The findings provide rare long-term evidence on how reducing infectious diseases in early life shapes health decades later. Public health programs like mass deworming are often debated, with some suggesting that removing parasites might weaken immune systems (the so-called “hygiene hypothesis”). My results show the opposite: early-life deworming improved both lifespan and markers of immune function, while not leading to more allergies. This evidence strengthens the case for ongoing global deworming campaigns, particularly in low-income settings where parasitic infections remain widespread.
Perspectives
The results suggest that tackling infections in early childhood can have lasting payoffs for health and survival, well into old age. They also challenge the idea that exposure to parasites like hookworm is necessary for a healthy immune system. Going forward, the research highlights how early-life conditions can shape the arc of health over the entire lifespan.
Ralph Lawton
Harvard University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Early-life infectious disease exposure, the “hygiene hypothesis,” and lifespan: Evidence from hookworm disease, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, August 2025, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2504265122.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







