How Waiting in University Admissions Can Widen Inequality

What is it about?

The article shows that waiting during university admissions—like holding out for a better offer—can unintentionally make social inequalities worse. Using data from hundreds of thousands of French students, the researchers found that students from lower-income backgrounds are less likely to wait, even when waiting would give them access to better, more prestigious, or better-fit programs. Because they feel more pressure to secure a spot quickly, they often accept less-preferred options. Meanwhile, students from higher-income families can afford to wait longer and end up in better programs. The big idea: When an admissions system rewards patience, it can accidentally reward students who already have more resources—and disadvantage those who don’t. The authors suggest that reducing unnecessary waiting or supporting students who might benefit from waiting could make admissions fairer.

Featured Image

Photo by Tasha Jolley on Unsplash

Photo by Tasha Jolley on Unsplash

Why is it important?

This is important because admissions decisions shape students’ entire educational and career paths. If lower-income students are pushed into less-preferred programs simply because they can’t afford to wait, the system ends up reinforcing inequalities instead of reducing them. Small design choices—like how long students must wait for offers—can have big, unintended consequences. Understanding this helps policymakers and institutions build admissions processes that give every student a fair chance, rather than advantaging those with more resources or stability.

Perspectives