What is it about?

This work is a comprehensive investigation into how different preservation methods affect natural rubber latex's (NRL) rheological behavior and microstructure. It contrasts the conventional ammoniated preservation system which employs ammonia and auxiliary hazardous preservatives (classified as Hazard Class 2.3 and regulated by OSHA’s 50 ppm exposure limit) with eco-friendly alternatives developed by AFLatex Technologies that effectively mitigate occupational and consumer hazards. The preservation of NRL is of utmost importance to prevent spontaneous coagulation and putrefaction. Traditionally, ammonia-based systems have been used; however, they pose significant health and environmental risks. The eco-friendly alternative not only circumvents these issues but also preserves the functional properties of the latex. In this study, we applied the Cross model, grounded in kinetic theory, to elucidate the material's shear-thinning and time constant behavior, which varies based on the structure. A proposed extended Krieger–Dougherty (K&D) model was then utilized to estimate the critical volume fraction a key parameter that aids in predicting both viscosity and the uniformity of the network formed during processing (controlled coagulation and film formation). Additionally, a Couette flow–based computational model was proposed to measure the effect of material properties (such as particle size and rubber density) on the critical volume faction driven by particle migration.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Health and safety improvements are among the leading factors driving this research. Moreover, integrating new technology into an older industry requires careful adaptation. Predicting key parameters such as viscosity and aggregation behavior by comparing eco‑friendly systems with well‑known ammoniated systems will be crucial for increasing industry adoption. Most importantly, this work advances the precise prediction of critical quality parameters, especially considering that NRL properties are subject to changes based on climate, crop variations, and species differences. Combining robust rheological models with sophisticated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations holds promise for enabling real‑time predictions of complex behaviors in industrial processes, paving the way for more efficient and reliable latex production. From an economic perspective, this advancement can lead to cost savings in several areas. Improved formulations may reduce waste treatment costs and resource management challenges while potentially enabling the development of new or improved products.

Perspectives

The practicality of this work is evident in the use of strain amplitude measurements. This method can reveal a material’s transition from linear‑like to highly nonlinear flow, particularly in type IV overshoot responses. This overshoot behavior, often lacking a straightforward physical interpretation, is a crucial study area. While large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) testing would provide richer insights, it is currently too resource‑intensive for routine or industrial use. Therefore, we turned to simpler viscometric methods, specifically shear rate ramps, to gather data for fitting to the Cross model. This approach allowed us to obtain robust estimates of non‑Newtonian regimes. By extending these results with the K&D model, we could predict how particle aggregation and viscosity evolve near critical volume fractions. Beyond volume fraction, parameters such as particle size and density—both of which can fluctuate with local climate conditions and tree species, can be readily varied in a CFD model proposed to predict changes in viscosity and particle aggregation. Implementing CFD at an initial screening stage, whether during rubber collection or formulation design, enables rapid estimation of critical volume fractions and viscosity shifts before committing to more extensive physical tests. This computational shortcut thus offers valuable, early-stage guidance for optimizing latex preservation processes, addressing the complexity of natural variability and the need for practical, efficient solutions.

Oliyad Dibisa
University of Wisconsin Madison

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Comparative rheology and microstructure analysis of natural rubber latex with conventional and eco-friendly preservatives, Physics of Fluids, March 2025, American Institute of Physics,
DOI: 10.1063/5.0255679.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page