What is it about?
The author critically reviews a randomized controlled trial by homeopathy for chronic headache and an observational follow-up study of the same patient cohort.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The results showed no difference between homeopathy and placebo. The author believes that these results were a ‘false negative’ due to inadequate homeopathic treatment, particularly relating to the duration of symptoms and handling of homeopathic aggravations. Guidelines for future studies are proposed.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Homeopathic treatment of chronic headache: a critique, Homeopathy, January 2002, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1054/homp.2001.0012.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page