What is it about?

This paper has explored the Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy (CATE; Thompson et al., 2003) in the lexical semantic domain and presented a complexity hierarchy based on typicality.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

although counterintuitive we have demonstrated that complexity impacts recovery of naming in aphasia; that is, training atypical, complex category items results in generalization to simpler typical examples but not vice versa. These findings indicate that the Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy (CATE; Thompson et al., 2003) can be extended to treatment of lexical semantic deficits by considering the typicality of category items.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Role of Semantic Complexity in Treatment of Naming Deficits, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, June 2003, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA),
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/048).
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page