What is it about?

Theories of learning can guide clinicians in selecting "treatment ingredients" intended to produce durable change in the system undergoing treatment. We used the rehabilitation treatment specification system (RTSS) to outline the hypothesized learning mechanisms underlying three naming treatments for aphasia and the treatment ingredients used across research studies. Four hypothesized learning mechanisms were identified. To maximize outcomes within the proposed learning mechanisms, researchers modified treatment ingredients such as cues, feedback, and scheduling. Variability in how the same treatment was administered across studies highlights the need for theoretically driven research comparing the effect of variations in treatment ingredients on outcomes.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Errorless, Errorful, and Retrieval Practice for Naming Treatment in Aphasia: A Scoping Review of Learning Mechanisms and Treatment Ingredients, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, February 2023, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA),
DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00251.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page