What is it about?
We surveyed three large, nationally representative samples of Americans, between mid-March and mid-April 2020. Most respondents reported taking measures to protect themselves and others, with higher rates among those who saw greater risks. Females, older, Black, and Hispanic Americans generally saw greater risks and did more to reduce them. There was broad support for investing in public health, financially helping people who were quarantined or lost wages, and sharing "honest, accurate information about the situation (even if that information worries people)."
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Early in the pandemic, most Americans had gotten the message about the threat, done things to reduce it, and supported public health policies.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Risk perceptions and health behaviors as COVID-19 emerged in the United States: Results from a probability-based nationally representative sample., Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, December 2021, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000374.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Baruch Fischhoff website
Website with related publications
Making Decisions in a COVID-19 World
Invited editorial on applying decision science to pandemic decisions
The COVID communication breakdown
Invited perspective on public health failures in pandemic communications, and the science for remedying them.
Assessing how consumers interpret and act on results from at-home COVID-19 self-test kits: A randomized clinical trial
A study finding that the instructions distributed with COVID-19 home test kits were often misinterpreted, and offering improved instructions, based on decision science principles.
The importance of testing messages. Fiona Fleck interviews Baruch Fischhoff.
Interview in World Health Organization Bulletin, on the science of risk communication and its application to pandemic disease.
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page