What is it about?
This article sets forth essential principles when reviewing literature of applied interventions, which would maximize contributions to both scholarship and applied practice in sport psychology. Specifically, we explore methodological and procedural elements relating to recent research evidence and the demands of real-world sporting contexts.
Featured Image
Photo by Brian Matangelo on Unsplash
Why is it important?
As systematic reviews distill, scrutinize, and synthesize many years of research findings, they are useful to a wide audience, which means it is critical that they are conducted to a high standard and follow the principles outlined in this paper. In adhering to these principles, systematic reviews can better inform applied practice and enhance their impact.
Perspectives
We feel that this paper is useful at a time when sports practice is becoming increasingly professionalized and reliant on an evidence base. Our article aims to inform the evidence base and its interpretation for practitioners. We hope those reading it find it interesting and useful.
Dr Ray Bobrownicki
University of Edinburgh
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Conducting systematic reviews of applied interventions: A comment on
Cabral et al. (2022)., Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology, August 2022, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/spy0000299.
You can read the full text:
Resources
University of Edinburgh Research Group Website
This is a link to the website of the Human Performance Science Research Group at the University of Edinburgh
Human Performance Science Research Group Twitter Page
Twitter page for the Human Performance Science Research Group at the University of Edinburgh
Dr Ray Bobrownicki's Twitter Account
A link to author's Twitter account.
Prof Dave Collins
A link to author's Twitter account
Dr Howie Carson's Google Scholar Page
Author's Google Scholar page.
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
