What is it about?
We compared the effectiveness of cognitive training techniques including general ability training using technology-based videogame interaction and specific instruction aimed at improving knowledge of driving and finances and fraud. Our primary outcomes included fraud detection, driving hazard perception, speed of processing, self-reported ability to carry out instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and other outcomes such as reasoning, numeracy, IADL task performance.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
We found little or no benefit for 20 hours of cognitive training relative to an active control puzzle solving condition either short term or after a year in terms of improvement in cognitive abilities such as speed of processing, memory performance. Knowledge training had a weak benefit immediately following training that dissipated a year later. It appears that ~20 hr of cognitive training has little impact on the ability of aging adults to maintain cognition or improve functioning on daily living activities such as driving or managing finances and avoiding fraud.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Relative effectiveness of general versus specific cognitive training for aging adults., Psychology and Aging, March 2022, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/pag0000663.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page