What is it about?
This research studied the association between dimensions of operational stress, forms of risk-taking with small arms, and possible mediators. Operational threat and negative affect were predictors, unauthorized preparedness and risky games were dependent variables, and safety climate and personality profile from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire—Revised Short Form were mediators. The participants were 461 compulsory service soldiers in 31 companies. The results revealed that operational threat is related to unauthorized preparedness, and positive–negative affect is related to risky games. Safety climate mediated risky games only. Unauthorized preparedness and risky games were influenced by the interaction of Psychoticism and the Lie scale from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire—Revised Short Form.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The P-L relationship seems to be quite interesting for both risk taking and cognitive psychopathology in general. See also: Glicksohn, J., & Bar-El, I. (2004-2005). Assessing personality and cognitive psychopathology in psychiatric patients. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 24, 25-40.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Dimensions of Operational Stress and Forms of Unacceptable Risk-Taking With Small Arms, Military Psychology, July 2013, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1037/mil0000003.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page