What is it about?

This case study is the first to apply the Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS) to group therapy. Ratings of alliance ruptures and repairs occurred at multiple group levels of interaction: member-to-member, member-to-therapist, and member-to-group. Over half of ruptures occurred between group members, and almost a third of repairs were initiated by patients. The 3RS may be useful to code ruptures and repairs in group therapy with some modifications to account for group levels of interactions.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The 3RS may be a useful tool for group therapy research and practice if combined with modifications to include coding for the relational level of the group at which ruptures and resolutions occur. It is possible that the target of resolution strategies in groups (e.g., therapist-to-group) needs to match the target of the rupture behavior (e.g., member-to-group) in order for successful repair to occur.

Perspectives

Therapeutic alliance rupture and repair research has direct implications for clinical practice. However, groups are complex because of the various levels of interactions that occur. Extending the 3RS to group contexts opens up an important area of practice-oriented research to help to inform clinical practice.

Giorgio Tasca
University of Ottawa

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Applying the Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS) to group therapy: An evidence-based case study., Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, March 2021, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/gdn0000137.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page