What is it about?
Dozens of studies show family income is correlated with lots of personal and family resources. Is this correlation due to income *causing* these resources, or are perhaps these resources causing income? This study look at changes over time (10 years in study 1, six years in study 2) to see which is more likely to be the causal agent. Surprisingly, it wasn't income. In fact, the data show that personal and family resources are driving changes over time in income!
Featured Image
Why is it important?
So many programs and policies intended to help families and children work under the assumption that increasing family income will help improve these family resources. We all learn as undergraduates that correlation is not causation, yet the literature showing *correlations* between income and family resources has been offered as evidence in support of these programs for decades. This study is important because it shows that when we conduct the kind of test that ought to be applied (longitudinal reciprocal prediction to change), the foundation for these programs and policies is revealed as erroneous. Skill-building will help grow family resources, income vouchers do not.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Family health and income: A two-sample replication., Journal of Family Psychology, August 2018, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/fam0000424.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page