Publication not explained

This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.

If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Now you see it, now you don't: A comparison of traditional versus random-effects regression models in the analysis of longitudinal follow-up data from a clinical trial., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, January 1997, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.65.2.252.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page