What is it about?

Moral philosophers and to some extent moral psychologists tend to assume that there is an essential difference between morals and manners. Ordinary people, arguably, do not make such a strict distinction and consider various norms-and-manner-driven behaviour highly morally relevant. This paper argues for an account of some significant manner-driven virtues as a sub-category of moral virtues of kindness.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

With increasing polarisation and harshness of public debate, the idea of a ‘civility deficit’ in contemporary society has become a popular discursive theme. We need civic or political virtues of civility more than ever, it is commonly argued. I agree, although the present article contributes to that discourse more by indirect implication than explicit engagement. But what about moral modes of civility in smaller-scale personal encounters? Those are less discussed in academic circles, or even written off in some academic quarters (as distinct from lay discourses) as having to do with ‘mere manners’, not ‘morality proper’. I argue that the small-scale moral virtues of kindness are more important than that.

Perspectives

We need a kinder world. Of course the "big" moral virtues such as compassion are important but so are the "small" virtues like considerateness.

Kristjan Kristjansson
University of Birmingham

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Kindly virtues: Identifying a subcategory of the “allocentric virtues”., Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, September 2025, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/teo0000333.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page