What is it about?
This study found that stress, depressive symptoms, illness, fatigue, job insecurity, and long work hours were linked to slower processing speed the following week. Measuring survey response times may help researchers better understand how everyday experiences affect cognitive performance.
Featured Image
Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Results suggested that employees and employers should consider that strain and recovery experiences can have lingering measurable effects on real life processing speed the following week. Use of survey response times as an approximation of everyday processing speed like in this study can help make research focused on the within-person relationships between everyday processing speed and a variety of dynamic factors more feasible and frequent.
Perspectives
The consequences of strain from work and other demands can be easy to dismiss by both employees and employers because they are often not objectively visible. Our team thought it was very cool that the signal of strain was objectively visible even in survey response times, which suggested that strain could have a subtle impact on cognitive performance on everyday behavior even a week later. With more objective evidence of the often subtle impacts of strain, hopefully the consequences of strain and the importance of recovery becomes less easily dismissible.
Raymond Hernandez
University of Southern California
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Strain and recovery activities over a week predict short-term changes in processing speed measured in everyday environments: A survey response-time study in workers from a large internet panel., Neuropsychology, July 2026, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/neu0001101.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
