What is it about?
This commentary explores the debate over using the word “dark” to describe personality traits like narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. While some critics argue the label sounds negative or biased, the authors defend it, showing that the term has actually helped bring researchers together and sparked important discoveries about the complex side of human nature.
Featured Image
Photo by David Valentine on Unsplash
Why is it important?
It is important because language can shape science. The word “dark” has become a powerful connector, uniting studies that might have stayed isolated and giving researchers a common way to talk about antagonistic personality traits. Keeping this shared framework supports collaboration, clarity, and deeper understanding of what drives human behavior.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: “Dark,” but useful: Why the term still matters—Commentary on Chester et al. (2025)., Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, November 2025, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/abn0001075.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







