What is it about?
This article pursues a comparative approach to honour, a choice determined not only by the fact that anthropology, with regard to other disciplines, has striven to build its specificity on comparative analysis ever since its beginnings in the nineteenth century. A further reason is to steer clear of methodological nationalism,1 i.e. to sidestep forms of Orientalism.2 The point, therefore, is to avoid the pitfall by which issues of honour and its more violent forms, such as honour killings or blood feuds, are downscaled to a ‘Turkish’ or ‘Albanian problem’ or to a phenomenon specific solely to Middle Eastern societies.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Honour between Different Cultures and Legal Systems: Social Status, Reputation, Struggles for Recognition, European Review, June 2016, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s1062798716000144.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page