What is it about?
Many people believe that we owe more to future generations than leaving them a planet that allows for a life that is barely worth living. However, they also believe that we do not have extensive duties of distributive justice (e.g. to produce common goods) toward foreigners because we do not share certain practices with them (e.g. membership in a state) . I explain why we cannot hold both positions conjointly. If shared practices are the basis of our duties of distributive justice, we don't have any such duties to future people because we don't share any practices with them.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Explains why accepting the thought that it is a matter of justice to care about the well-being of future generations also commits us to care about the well-being of contemporary distant strangers as a matter of justice.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Practice-Independence of Intergenerational Justice, Utilitas, April 2016, Cambridge University Press,
DOI: 10.1017/s095382081600008x.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page