What is it about?
This article by Chi-Hé Elder examines the complexities of microaggressions, which are subtle, often unintentional, offensive remarks targeting aspects of a person’s identity. The paper explores how these microaggressions are communicated and perceived, focusing on the challenges of identifying them and holding speakers accountable. The article also highlights the difficulty for recipients in determining whether an offensive remark was intentional or a misunderstanding, and for speakers to deny responsibility by claiming they were misunderstood. Overall, the paper illustrates how microaggressions can be both implicit and explicit, and how they reflect underlying societal prejudices.
Featured Image
Photo by Obie Fernandez on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This article is important because it sheds light on the subtle and often overlooked nature of microaggressions in everyday conversations. By exploring the fine line between intentional and unintentional offenses, it provides a deeper understanding of how these remarks can impact individuals and perpetuate societal biases. The article’s insights into the mechanisms of implicature and accountability offer valuable tools for recognizing and addressing microaggressions, contributing to more respectful and inclusive communication. This research is relevant not only to linguistics but also to social psychology, philosophy, and any field concerned with social justice and equity.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Microaggression or misunderstanding? Implicatures, inferences and accountability, Journal of Pragmatics, July 2021, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.020.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page