What is it about?
The question of how to assess research outputs published in journals is now a global concern for academics. Numerous journal ratings and rankings exist, some featuring perceptual and peer-review-based journal ranks, some focusing on objective information related to citations, some using a combination of the two. This research consolidates existing journal rankings into an up-to-date and comprehensive list.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
We are using a new classification approach, ‘random forests’, and data envelopment analysis as sound methodologies to arrive at a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings – A classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis, Omega, March 2015, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.08.002.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page