What is it about?
Solving Michaelis-Menten eqaution as an important biological model by comparative Analytic-approximate methods and its analogue with Picard and Picard Pade methods as iterative schemes to reach final favorite approximate solution of model
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The fact that physical phenomena are modelled, mostly, by nonlinear differential equations underlines the importance of having reliable methods to solve them. In this work, we present a comparison of homotopy perturbation method (HPM), nonlinearities distribution homotopy perturbation method (NDHPM), Picard, and Picard–Pade´ methods to solve Michaelis–Menten equation.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A comparison of HPM, NDHPM, Picard and Picard–Padé methods for solving Michaelis–Menten equation, Journal of King Saud University - Science, January 2015, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2014.11.001.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page