What is it about?
Previous research suggests that when social exclusion is communicated in an explicit manner, consumers express preferences for helping, whereas when it is communicated in an implicit manner, they express preferences for conspicuous consumption. However, this may not always hold true. The present research shows that exclusion effects depend on the extent to which exclusion is communicated in a culturally normative or counter-normative manner, rather than whether it is communicated in an explicit or implicit manner.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Exclusion communicated in a cultural norm-congruent manner produces preferences for helping, whereas exclusion communicated in a cultural norm-incongruent manner produces preferences for conspicuous consumption. Also, differential needs (self-esteem and power) threatened by normative and counter-normative exclusion explain these distinct preferences.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The role of cultural communication norms in social exclusion effects, Journal of Consumer Psychology, January 2017, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.006.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page