Publication not explained

This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.

If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Meta-analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography versus standard of care strategy for the evaluation of low risk chest pain: Are randomized controlled trials and cohort studies showing the same evidence?, International Journal of Cardiology, November 2014, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.012.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page