What is it about?
The aim of this study is to examine care omissions and their causes in oncology units. Methods: Participants were recruited from all of the hospitals in the Republic of Cyprus with oncology in-patient units. The data were collected with the MISSCARE questionnaire consisting of demographics, part A related to the elements of missed care and part B asking the reasons why nurses omit care. Results: One hundred and fifty seven registered nurses participated in the study (Response Rate=91.8%). The mean value for part A of the MISSCARE survey was moderate (2.31 from 4). The elements of care described as frequently or always missed were: turning the patient every 2 h (66.9%); ambulation three times a day or as needed (49.1%); mouth care (61.1%); patient teaching (37.6%); emotional support (32.5%); and attend any interdisciplinary conferences (87.9%). Reported causes included inadequate number of staff, urgent patient situations and unexpected rise in patient volume/unit acuity. Correlations showed that there is a relationship between care rationing and job satisfaction (r = 0.469, p < 0.05), with the less satisfied nurses reporting higher incidences of care omissions.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
It is one of the very few studies that have examined the phenomenon of rationing in nursing care in these very important for patient care settings
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: To what extent are patients' needs met on oncology units? The phenomenon of care rationing, European Journal of Oncology Nursing, April 2016, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.01.002.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page