What is it about?
It is an article making some comments on the article of Banaee et al. (2014).
Featured Image
Why is it important?
1) Gives a summary of the contribution to science by Banaee et al. (2014). 2) It suggests that a clearer description of the imaged conjunctival tissue could be useful to other researchers for repeating the experiment. 3) It corrects a reference to the work of Koutsiaris et al. which was categorized as "qualitative" by explaining why it was fully quantitative.
Perspectives
1) Gives a summary of the contribution to science by Banaee et al. (2014). 2) It suggests that a clearer description of the imaged conjunctival tissue could be useful to other researchers for repeating the experiment. 3) It corrects a reference to the work of Koutsiaris et al. which was categorized as "qualitative" by explaining why it was fully quantitative.
Dr Aristotle G Koutsiaris
University of Thessaly
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Comments on the published article: “Distribution of normal superficial ocular vessels in digital images, Banaee et al. (2014)”, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, August 2014, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2014.04.007.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
