What is it about?
It engages in dialogue with Goffman’s work on facework and rituals (highlighting what is considered a 'red light' in social interactions), Tracy's pragmatics work on stance and face attack, and the Appraisal and metafunctional approaches. It uses the concept ‘attitudinal profile’ and introduces the concepts of ‘Evaluative Textbites’ and ‘Attitudinal Priming,’ offering a fresh perspective on linguistic investigations of identity attacks and identity work and fusion.
Featured Image
Photo by Nik on Unsplash
Why is it important?
It is the first systematic study of identity attacks despite their prevalence in hate crimes and violent extremist discourse. It enables suspecting threatening behaviour/communications, and it is applicable to political discourse to help us understand how and why politicians attack different aspects of identity of their rivals. This work not only enhances our understanding of language and identity in extremist narratives but also has significant implications for identity work in hate speech, genocidal rhetoric, and defamation.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Unmasking Malicious Stance Indicators and Attitudinal Priming: An ‘Evaluative Textbite’ Approach to Identity Attacks in Violent Extremist Discourse, Corpus Pragmatics, July 2024, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s41701-024-00172-3.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page