What is it about?

Thus, we wondered whether Ru(II) complexes, substituted with different dinitrogenated ligands (i.e. 2,2′-bipyridine or 1,10-phenanthroline), are suitable as biomarkers in walled cell such as bacteria (Gram-negative bacteria: Salmonella enterica; Gram-positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus) and yeasts (Candida albicans and Cryptococcus spp.).

Featured Image

Why is it important?

cis-Ru(deeb)3 2+ (R1; where deeb is 4,4′-diethanoate-2,2′-bipyridine) and cis-Ru(phen)3 2+ (R2; where phen is 1,10-phenanthroline) were synthesized. Although the presence of the cell wall (a structure that is present in yeasts and bacteria,) was previously described as a natural barrier that hampers the uptake of d6-based luminescent complexes, we previously demonstrated that rhenium(I) tricarbonyl complexes were useful to stain both yeasts and bacteria. Even though several studies of classical ruthenium(II) complexes can be found, none of those studies aimed to determine the potential of these compounds as biomarkers for walled cells, testing only cell lines that lack this permeability barrier. Walled cells exhibit a relatively rigid structure, mainly constituted by carbohydrates and proteins, and surround the plasma membrane. In this manuscript, we observed that both R1 and R2 exhibited very low cytotoxicity in different walled-cell models (including bacteria and yeasts). More importantly, we found that both R1 and R2 were able to fluorescently stain Candida albicans (yeast), with a simple and fast procedure, without the need of additional permeabilizer molecules and antibodies. Interestingly, R1 remained retained in a discrete central structure consistent with the cell nucleus, whereas R2 seemed to be accumulated in the cell wall. These results show that these two complexes can be used as biomarkers for walled cells as differential staining, supporting the fact that, as well as with rhenium(I) complexes, biomarkers properties can be modulated by changing the substituents in ruthenium(II)-derivative luminescent stains, even for walled cells.

Perspectives

These complexes showed very low cytotoxicity against different cell models, including bacteria and yeasts. Regarding the biomarker potential, since R1 and R2 presented different staining pattern in yeasts, we concluded that changes in the substituents of the dinitrogenated ligands can be used to modulate biomarker properties of these kind of Ru(II) complexes, even for walled cells. These results show that these two complexes could be used as biomarkers for walled cells as luminescent staining. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that ruthenium(II) complexes can be used as biomarkers for walled cells.

Dr Alexander Carreño
UNAB

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Prototypical cis-ruthenium(II) complexes present differential fluorescent staining in walled-cell models (yeasts), Chemical Papers, March 2019, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-019-00714-z.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page