What is it about?
This paper examines a recent study on the journals where Nobel Prize-winning research in Physics is published. The study found that while prestigious multidisciplinary journals like Nature and Science feature prominently, many Nobel-winning discoveries are published in specialized journals with moderate impact factors. The paper critiques this approach, pointing out that important references in Nobel Prize background documents might be overlooked if only the total number of citations is considered. It suggests that focusing on frequently cited references and considering additional resources, like the "Further Reading" sections, could provide a clearer picture of the influential research behind Nobel Prizes.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This work sheds light on the nuances of how Nobel Prize-winning research is documented and published. By highlighting gaps in the current study methods, it emphasizes the need for a more refined approach to analyzing the scientific background of Nobel Prizes. This could lead to a better understanding of the key publications and contributors in the field, improving the accuracy and relevance of scientometric analyses. Addressing these issues may enhance the way we recognize and interpret groundbreaking research, ultimately benefiting both scientific communities and public knowledge.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Facts to consider when analyzing the references of Nobel Prize scientific background, Scientometrics, April 2020, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03456-y.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page