What is it about?
This paper introduces and discusses the Single Publication Hirsch Index, a metric designed to better assess the impact of a scientific paper. Unlike traditional citation counts, this index takes into account both the quantity and quality of the papers that cite a work. It helps distinguish between papers that have a genuine influence on the scientific community and those with artificially inflated citation numbers, such as through self-citations or citation manipulation.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The Single Publication Hirsch Index offers a more reliable way to evaluate the significance of scientific papers, addressing some of the flaws in traditional citation metrics. By differentiating between the importance of citing papers, it can help to detect issues like citation manipulation and improve how we assess the lasting influence of research. This index could lead to fairer evaluations of research output, which is crucial in a time when citation metrics are often used to judge the quality of scientific work.
Perspectives
I believe that the Single Publication Hirsch Index could be a valuable tool for the scientific community. It not only adds depth to how we assess the impact of individual papers but also brings attention to potential issues like excessive self-citation. While no metric can be perfect, this index offers a more nuanced approach than simple citation counts, helping to ensure that research evaluations are more accurate and less prone to manipulation. I encourage organizations involved in scientific indexing to consider adopting it as part of their assessment toolkit.
Houcemeddine Turki
Universite de Sfax
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Usefulness of the single publication h-index, Scientometrics, December 2015, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1808-y.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
