What is it about?
This study delves into the world of examination cheating, revealing it's not just a solo act but also a team effort. It highlights two main ways students cheat: individually, by using unauthorized materials or help without anyone else's knowledge - and collectively, where students collaborate to cheat. Our research uncovers the psychological traits linked with both types of cheating, suggesting that understanding these underlying factors can help in developing better strategies to combat academic dishonesty. It is a call to look beyond the act itself and into the reasons and modes of cheating, aiming for solutions that address the root of the problem.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This research stands out for its nuanced examination of examination dishonesty, framing it as a complex issue with both individual and collective dimensions. By dissecting the psychological underpinnings of both types of cheating, the study offers a fresh perspective on academic integrity. Its timely contribution lies in addressing the growing concern over academic dishonesty in an increasingly collaborative educational environment. The findings could significantly influence educational policies and interventions, promoting a culture of integrity and understanding the multifaceted nature of cheating, thus appealing to a wide audience including educators, policymakers, and psychologists.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: “I Cheat” or “We Cheat?” The Structure and Psychological Correlates of Individual vs. Collective Examination Dishonesty, Journal of Academic Ethics, February 2024, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09514-x.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page