What is it about?

The chironomid fauna living in running waters in the Southern Alps was investigated from an ecological and biogeographical point of view: 202 species were identified (not including terrestrial species). It must be emphasised that species identification is tentative within some genera, especially those awaiting revision (e.g., Boreoheptagyia, Chaetocladius). Although much taxonomic work was done in the past on the chironomid Alpine fauna, there are still many unsolved problems. Most of the species found are widespread in the Palearctic Region, with no evidence of bio-geographical barriers separating different Alpine sectors. Really a relatively high number of species reported from the northern and western side (France, Switzerland, Austria) of the Alps was not captured on the southern side (Italy), whereas most species found on the southern side are also present on the northern one. Very few species are reported from southern side only. Lack of sampling, imperfect taxonomic knowledge and different environmental conditions between the northern and southern sides may be responsible of this result. A comparison of the fauna of the southern Alps with the fauna of the Apennines suggests that the differences are probably more related to ecological conditions (lack of glaciers in the Apennines) than to biogeographical barriers. Different chironomid assemblages colonise manifold habitat types: strict cold-stenothermal species tolerating high current velocity (e.g., Diamesa latitarsis – steinboecki group) are almost the sole inhabitants of kryal biotopes, while other cold-stenothermal species are restricted to cold springs (Diamesa dampfi, D. incallida, Tokunagaia rectangularis, T. tonollii), there are also species characteristic of hygropetric habitats (Syndiamesa edwardsi, S. nigra) or restricted to lacustrine habitats (Corynoneura lacustris, Paratanytarsus austriacus). It must be emphasised that different responses to environmental factors can be observed between species belonging to the same genus (e.g., Diamesa, Eukiefferiella, Orthocladius, Paratrichocladius), so species identification is really needed for a good ecological work.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Water temperature, current velocity, substrate type are the most critical factors, sometime chironomid species appear to be rather opportunistic and their presence or absence cannot be clearly related to a well defined range of values of environmental variables: be it a lack of knowledge or a real datum will be the task of future studies. The waters of the Alps are still relatively unpolluted, but hydraulic stress due to river damming and canalization is a serious problem for macrofauna conservation, and as the glaciers retreat, the species confined to the glacial snouts are at risk of extinction, some of them possibly even before their existence be discovered.

Perspectives

Spatial and temporal changes of chironomid fauna in terms of number of individuals and/or species can be explained through the effects of short term and long term climate change. Inter-annual variations can be explained by exceptional climatic conditions such as an extremely warm summer or cold winter; they modify physical variables (e. g. an higher discharge, a shorter or longer snow cover) promoting a global community response with interspecies competition. These causal events can be complicated by stochastic factors such as the chance that an adult female deposits eggs. There is enough evidence that the glaciated areas in the Alps, and cold water habitats in the Mediterranean region in general, are at serious risk in relation with the global climatic change.

Dr Angela Boggero
CNR-Water Research Institute

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Chironomids from Southern Alpine Running Waters: Ecology, Biogeography*, Hydrobiologia, June 2006, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1813-x.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page