What is it about?
In this study, we assessed and compared the efficiency and robustness of optimized spatial strategies for targeting CPs and land use changes to control nutrient loss from agricultural watersheds under a changing climate. Physical nutrient reduction effectiveness and economic efficiency of these strategies were assessed using an integrated framework (Xu et al. 2018) that includes three components: (1) an ecohydrological model—the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT; Arnold et al. 2010, 1998)—to evaluate the effects of CPs and alternative land uses on crop/plant yields and nutrient discharges at the field scale, (2) an economic valuation component that estimates economic costs and income losses associated with each CP or land use change, and (3) a linear optimization algorithm to identify optimal spatial patterns of land use and management that can maximize economic returns at watershed scale, given a certain nutrient reduction target.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Understanding robustness of alternative management strategies, both physically and economically, to climate change is important for managers, policymakers, and stakeholders as they seek to prioritize allocation of limited conservation funding for more effective and robust actions, which can be critical to ensure the success of water quality improvement.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Sensitivity to climate change of land use and management patterns optimized for efficient mitigation of nutrient pollution, Climatic Change, March 2018, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-018-2159-5.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page