What is it about?
The purpose of this study was to validate the model developed by Alleyne et al. (2013) for the Indonesian context.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Our study contributes by providing new insights into the relationship between the individual levels of the antecedents and how the intention of whistleblowing is moderated by perceived organizational support (POS), team norms (TNs), and perceived moral intensity (PMI). In this paper, we argue that the intention of both internal and external whistleblowing depends on the individual-level antecedents [attitudes toward whistleblowing, perceived behavioral control, independence commitment, personal responsibility for reporting, and personal cost of reporting (PCR)] and is moderated by POS, TNs, and PMI.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Whistleblowing Intentions Among Public Accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the Moderation Effects, Journal of Business Ethics, September 2016, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3318-0.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page