What is it about?
How do the institutional structures devised in the past for supporting wildlife and biodiversity conservation influence the success of the most recent addition to the policymakers' toolbox - landscape conservation. Article shows that the institutional structures of the past are ill-suited for landscape level conservation approaches, outlines the newer ways of thinking that will work better (and mass-based as opposed to elite-based approaches to conservation; "integrative, as opposed to "integrated" approaches; and, sustainable use as opposed to preservationist approaches to conservation), and shows how these newer approaches will ensure the sustainability of landscape conservation.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals asks for protection of land rights, and the protections of natural resources, biodiversity, and wildlife. Equally important, the most challenging sites for these goals tend to overlap quite significantly. Simultaneous pursuit of the goals of social justice and environmental conservation requires that we develop new approaches that are interdisciplinary, respond to the interests and stakes of social groups who may not have had a voice in the conservation interventions of the past, but are likely to play a very important role in the years and decades to come. This article presents grounded findings about the confluence of these important goals and provides a framework that enables us to rethink the past approaches to nature conservation to make them socially just and sustainable.
Perspectives
This is an effort to present the tools of institutional analysis and its logic to a broader audience, including the scholars in natural and physical sciences. It asks, what does public participation look like in the context of landscape conservation, which defies the simple model of a "local" community available for consultations and participation in planning "local" conservation? What if such a community is not available, and conservation is no more a small-scale intervention? What institutional structures must the conservationists engage with and what goals and approaches could inform their thinking about the development-conservation linkages? I'd greatly appreciate the engagement of other social scientists as well as from natural scientists with shared interests in pursuing a socially just model of nature conservation.
Dr Prakash Kashwan
University of Connecticut
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Power asymmetries and institutions: landscape conservation in central India, Regional Environmental Change, March 2016, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0925-8.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
