What is it about?

We analyze corporate financing with a bank loan (or equity) when the firm gives trade credit using contract theory. There is a moral hazard, where the firm cannot be monitored and may not exert enough effort towards the project. In the symmetric case, the bank and the firm have the same information whether the trade credit will default or not. In the asymmetric case, the firm learns whether its buyer will pay or not before choosing her level of efforts.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

We prove that in the asymmetric case the borrowing capacity (the available bank loans) and the welfare of the society are weakly smaller than in the symmetric case. We also show that the default risk of a given trade credit weakly decreases borrowing capacity compared to the case when the buyer pays for sure. However, it turns out that having a risky buyer might increase borrowing capacity and welfare, which can be used as a signaling device.

Perspectives

It is interesting that giants in contract theory were given the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel: Jean-Tirole (2014), Oliver Hart and Bengt Holmström (2016).

Dr Péter Csóka

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Corporate financing under moral hazard and the default risk of buyers, Central European Journal of Operations Research, August 2013, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s10100-013-0319-2.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page