What is it about?
This article reviews the pros and cons of centralized, decentralized, and distributed networks for medical research dissemination and proposes a human-computer hybrid research network to improve peer review and data security.
Featured Image
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This article provides a useful analysis of different network models for medical research and makes the case for an innovative hybrid approach that could enhance research quality and security through more rigorous peer review and blockchain data storage. The proposed solution is timely given the need to improve safeguards against bias, hacking, and corruption in the research process.
Perspectives
The comparison of centralized, decentralized, and distributed networks highlights key tradeoffs in research dissemination. The proposed human-computer hybrid model is intriguing - by combining human intelligence and blockchain technology, it could facilitate more robust peer review and verification while avoiding pitfalls like slowed publication speed. Implementing such an approach thoughtfully could enhance trust in research overall.
Thomas F Heston MD
University of Washington
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Distributed Research Networks, January 2023, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-14591-9_12.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
