What is it about?
Language influences how we see the world and act in it. The word "stakeholder" is common, but it might unintentionally support colonial ideas and unfair systems. This article looks at the problems with using "stakeholder," such as its unclear meaning and its tendency to exclude certain groups. We highlight the need for words that give a voice to marginalized people, promote fairness, and encourage their genuine involvement in decision-making. By questioning the use of "stakeholder" and suggesting different approaches, we aim to help make research and society more fair and inclusive. Instead of proposing a single new term, we recommend focusing on the people, places, and animals impacted by decisions and projects.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Our choice of words is essential. The words we use help create ideas and convey meaning, shaping how we understand and interact with the world. Language guides our thoughts and actions, influencing decision-making and how we see the world. Therefore, it is essential to consider inclusive language, which promotes diversity and inclusion instead of disadvantaging certain groups.
Perspectives
Writing this collaborative article with my co-authors was an incredibly enriching and educational experience. Collaborating with experienced authors who are experts in this field was both an honour and a pleasure. This article not only allowed me to contribute to the existing body of knowledge but also sparked important discussions about the use of language in research and its significant impact on the field.
Dr Sadiq Bhanbhro
Sheffield Hallam University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world, Sustainability Science, April 2024, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
