Publication not explained

This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.

If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries, European Journal of Social Psychology, August 2014, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2052.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page