All Stories

  1. Annotated insights into legal reasoning: A dataset of Article 6 ECHR cases
  2. Combining a Legal Knowledge Model with Machine Learning for Reasoning with Legal Cases
  3. Whatever Happened to Hypotheticals?
  4. ANGELIC II
  5. Argumentation schemes in AI and Law
  6. Practical tools from formal models
  7. Precedential constraint
  8. Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law
  9. Ethical approaches and autonomous systems
  10. The Need for Good Old Fashioned AI and Law
  11. States, goals and values: Revisiting practical reasoning
  12. Accommodating change
  13. Special issue in memory of Carole Hafner: editor’s introduction
  14. A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
  15. Establishing norms with metanorms in distributed computational systems
  16. Transition systems for designing and reasoning about norms
  17. Senses of ‘argument’ in instantiated argumentation frameworks
  18. Evaluating the use of abstract dialectical frameworks to represent case law
  19. Factors, issues and values
  20. Using Argumentation to Structure E-Participation in Policy Making
  21. Arguments as a new perspective on character motive in stories
  22. Dilemmas and paradoxes: cycles in argumentation frameworks
  23. Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues
  24. Strategies for question selection in argumentative dialogues about plans
  25. A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+
  26. A Strategy for Efficient Persuasion Dialogues
  27. Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values
  28. Argumentation based tools for policy-making
  29. On the Instantiation of Knowledge Bases in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
  30. Structuring E-Participation in Policy Making through Argumentation
  31. A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law
  32. A factor-based definition of precedential constraint
  33. Multi-agent based classification using argumentation from experience
  34. PISA: A framework for multiagent classification using argumentation
  35. Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors
  36. Arguments over Co-operative Plans
  37. Model Based Critique of Policy Proposals
  38. Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive?
  39. Dynamic assignment of roles, rights and responsibilities in normative multi-agent systems
  40. Using argumentation to model agent decision making in economic experiments
  41. Arguing from experience using multiple groups of agents
  42. Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation
  43. Semantic models for policy deliberation
  44. Towards a Structured Online Consultation Tool
  45. Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases
  46. Metalevel argumentation
  47. Arguing Global Governance
  48. Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law
  49. Emotions in Rational Decision Making
  50. Multi-Party Argument from Experience
  51. PADUA: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules
  52. Editorial: Logic and Law Corner
  53. Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks
  54. Did he jump or was he pushed?
  55. Abstract Argumentation and Values
  56. Arguing from Experience to Classifying Noisy Data
  57. Argumentation in Legal Reasoning
  58. Case law in extended argumentation frameworks
  59. Isomorphism and argumentation
  60. Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning
  61. Towards Dynamic Assignment of Rights and Responsibilities to Agents (Short Version)
  62. Introducing the Logic and Law Corner
  63. Argumentation in artificial intelligence
  64. Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
  65. Argumentation and standards of proof
  66. Argumentation over ontology correspondences in MAS
  67. Audiences in argumentation frameworks
  68. An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application
  69. Computational Representation of Practical Argument
  70. PARMENIDES: Facilitating Deliberation in Democracies
  71. Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
  72. A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action
  73. AGATHA: Using heuristic search to automate the construction of case law theories
  74. Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law
  75. Argumentation in AI and Law: Editors' Introduction
  76. Legal Case-based Reasoning as Practical Reasoning
  77. AGATHA
  78. Application of argument based machine learning to law
  79. Arguing about cases as practical reasoning
  80. Determining Preferences Through Argumentation
  81. SweetProlog: A System to Integrate Ontologies and Rules
  82. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
  83. Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
  84. Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
  85. Developing legal knowledge based systems through theory construction
  86. Towards a computational account of persuasion in law
  87. Try to See it My Way: Modelling Persuasion in Legal Discourse
  88. Coherence in finite argument systems
  89. An ontology model to facilitate knowledge-sharing in multi-agent systems
  90. Dynamic arguments in a case law domain
  91. Theory based explanation of case law domains
  92. Validation and verification of knowledge-based systems: report on EUROVAV99
  93. The KRAFT architecture for knowledge fusion and transformation
  94. Temporal reasoning using tesseral addressing: towards an intelligent environmental impact assessment system
  95. Techniques for the verification and validation of knowledge-based systems: A survey based on the symbol/knowledge level distinction
  96. Domain-driven knowledge modelling for knowledge acquisition
  97. An Examination of Some Metaphorical Contexts for Biologically Motivated Computing
  98. In defence of rule‐based representations for legal knowledge‐based systems
  99. Coupling hypertext and knowledge based systems: Two applications in the legal domain
  100. Argument‐based explanation of the British nationality act as a logic program
  101. Integrating legal support systems through document models
  102. Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems
  103. Maintenance tools for knowledge-based systems: the MAKE project
  104. The maintenance of legal knowledge based systems
  105. Argument-based explanation of logic programs
  106. Hierarchical formalizations
  107. Expert systems in the UK: From AI to KBS
  108. Logic
  109. Introduction to Knowledge Representation
  110. Logic and Predicate Calculus
  111. Some Issues in Knowledge Representation
  112. Modelling devices and modelling speakers
  113. People interact through computers not with them
  114. Humpty dumpty, private languages and logic programmers
  115. Knowledge representation
  116. Reinterpreting the Proofs of The Existence of God
  117. A note on Mr. Karmo's disturbances
  118. Co-ordination and Co-operation in Agent Systems: Social Laws and Argumentation
  119. Abstract Argumentation Scheme Frameworks
  120. ARGUMENTATION
  121. The ideal audience and artificial intelligence and law
  122. A multi-agent legal argument generator
  123. An experiment in discovering association rules in the legal domain