All Stories

  1. Translating Q methodology results into survey questions for large-scale use: a comparison of approaches
  2. Creating the conditions for meaningful and effective PPIE in community-based public health research: learning from a UK-wide lived experience panel
  3. Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study
  4. Trading-off outcomes and policy characteristics of a Universal Basic Income and a Minimum Income Guarantee: Evidence from an exploratory mixed-method preference-based study
  5. Is Government Policy a Barrier or Facilitator to the Work of Place-Based Community-led Nonprofits?
  6. Causes, Solutions and Health Inequalities: Comparing Perspectives of Professional Stakeholders and Community Participants Experiencing Low Income and Poor Health in London
  7. Poverty and multiple long-term health conditions: Financial diaries to explore daily challenges
  8. From polarity to plurality: Perceptions of COVID‐19 and policy measures in England and Scotland
  9. Charting public views on the meaning of illness severity
  10. We need to talk about values: a proposed framework for the articulation of normative reasoning in health technology assessment
  11. Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems
  12. A severely fragmented concept: Uncovering citizens’ subjective accounts of severity of illness
  13. Policy actors’ perceptions of public participation to tackle health inequalities in Scotland: a paradox?
  14. Common health assets protocol: a mixed-methods, realist evaluation and economic appraisal of how community-led organisations (CLOs) impact on the health and well-being of people living in deprived areas
  15. Protocol for estimating the willingness-to-pay-based value for a quality-adjusted life year to aid health technology assessment in India: a cross-sectional study
  16. Public values and plurality in health priority setting: What to do when people disagree and why we should care about reasons as well as choices
  17. Microcredit as a public health initiative? Exploring mechanisms and pathways to health and wellbeing
  18. Walking a Tightrope: Using Financial Diaries to Investigate Day-to-Day Financial Decisions and the Social Safety Net of the Financially Excluded
  19. Exploring the relative value of end of life QALYs: Are the comparators important?
  20. Microcredit for enterprise in the UK as an ‘alternative’ economic space
  21. Who knows best? A Q methodology study to explore perspectives of professional stakeholders and community participants on health in low-income communities
  22. Filling a void? The role of social enterprise in addressing social isolation and loneliness in rural communities
  23. Innovating on Methods to Understand the Relationship Between Finances and Wellbeing
  24. Two false positives do not make a right: Setting the bar of social enterprise research even higher through avoiding the straw man fallacy
  25. Self reliant groups from India to Scotland: lessons from south to north
  26. Are life-extending treatments for terminal illnesses a special case? Exploring choices and societal viewpoints
  27. Is “end of life” a special case? Connecting Q with survey methods to measure societal support for views on the value of life-extending treatments
  28. Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health
  29. Health and Brexit
  30. ‘Hidden Habitus’: A Qualitative Study of Socio-Ecological Influences on Drinking Practices and Social Identity in Mid-Adolescence
  31. Marketing Authorization Procedures for Advanced Cancer Drugs
  32. Conceptualising the public health role of actors operating outside of formal health systems: The case of social enterprise
  33. Priority to End of Life Treatments? Views of the Public in the Netherlands
  34. From representing views to representativeness of views: Illustrating a new (Q2S) approach in the context of health care priority setting in nine European countries
  35. Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right and an expensive death? Exploring societal perspectives
  36. Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology
  37. Health Care Priority Setting Q-Sort
  38. The potential of social enterprise to enhance health and well-being: A model and systematic review
  39. Autonomy, special offers and routines: a Q methodological study of industry-driven marketing influences on young people's drinking behaviour
  40. Valuing QALYs at the end of life
  41. Did people “buy” what was “sold”? A qualitative evaluation of a contingent valuation survey information set for gains in life expectancy
  42. Comparing WTP Values of Different Types of QALY Gain Elicited from the General Public
  43. Estimating a WTP-based value of a QALY: The ‘chained’ approach
  44. A Person Trade-Off Study to Estimate Age-Related Weights for Health Gains in Economic Evaluation
  45. Q-ING FOR HEALTH-A NEW APPROACH TO ELICITING THE PUBLIC'S VIEWS ON HEALTH CARE RESOURCE ALLOCATION
  46. Social enterprise: New pathways to health and well-being?
  47. Searchers vs surveyors in estimating the monetary value of a QALY: resolving a nasty dilemma for NICE
  48. Social business, health and well-being
  49. Understanding public preferences for prioritizing health care interventions in England: Does the type of health gain matter?
  50. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments
  51. The social value of a QALY: raising the bar or barring the raise?
  52. Estimating the additional cost of disability: Beyond budget standards
  53. Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project
  54. ‘I’ve just taken you to see the man with the CD on his head’: the experience and management of recurrent sore throat in children
  55. What needs to be done in contingent valuation: have Smith and Sach missed the boat?
  56. Valuing lives equally in a benefit-coast analysis of safety projects: A method to reconcile theory and practice
  57. Willingness to pay for a QALY: past, present and future
  58. How do respondents explain WTP responses? A review of the qualitative evidence
  59. Valuing lives equally: Defensible premise or unwarranted compromise?
  60. The New Myth
  61. A Face-Validity Test of Response Strategies to ‘Dread Risks'
  62. Economic rationality and health and lifestyle choices for people with diabetes
  63. Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain
  64. Q methodology in health economics
  65. Guiding the design and selection of interventions to influence the implementation of evidence-based practice: an experimental simulation of a complex intervention trial
  66. Issues arising from the use of qualitative methods in health economics
  67. Responses to standard gambles: are preferences‘well constructed’?
  68. Effects of Treatment with Formoterol on Bronchoprotection against Methacholine