All Stories

  1. What is binaural fusion? Why is it so hard to explain and harder to measure?
  2. Loss of access to certain speech sounds with bionic hearing because of previous sound
  3. Spectral degradation and carrier sentences increase age-related temporal processing deficits in a cue-specific manner
  4. The Rapid Decline in Interaural-Time-Difference Sensitivity for Pure Tones Can Be Explained by Peripheral Filtering
  5. Cochlear-implant listeners benefit from training with time-compressed speech, even at advanced ages
  6. Reduced digit spans and ear dominance using dichotic digits in bimodal cochlear-implant users
  7. How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research
  8. The rapid decline in interaural-time-difference sensitivity for pure tones can be explained by peripheral filtering
  9. How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research
  10. Effect of experimentally introduced interaural frequency mismatch on sentence recognition in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners
  11. Wave interference at the contralateral ear helps explain non-monotonic envelope interaural time differences as a function of azimuth
  12. Effect of experimentally introduced interaural frequency mismatch on sentence recognition in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners
  13. Performance on stochastic figure-ground perception varies with individual differences in speech-in-noise recognition and working memory capacity
  14. Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users
  15. Impacts of signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users
  16. Open-Set Phoneme Recognition Performance With Varied Temporal Cues in Younger and Older Cochlear Implant Users
  17. Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological measures of pulse-rate discrimination
  18. Stimulus context affects the phonemic categorization of temporally based word contrasts in adult cochlear-implant users
  19. Individual differences in speech stream segregation and working memory differentially predict performance on a stochastic figure-ground task
  20. The Relationship Between Interaural Insertion-Depth Differences, Scalar Location, and Interaural Time-Difference Processing in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners
  21. Intracranial lateralization bias observed in the presence of symmetrical hearing thresholds
  22. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
  23. New beamforming approach improves speech understanding in noise without hampering localization
  24. When attending to an ear can be difficult for cochlear-implant users
  25. Computed-tomography estimates of interaural mismatch in insertion depth and scalar location in bilateral cochlear-implant users
  26. Repair of broken speech with cochlear implants: Not possible?
  27. Interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch estimates using CT scans and binaural perception, but not pitch, are consistent in cochlear-implant users
  28. A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users
  29. Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
  30. Head Shadow, Summation, and Squelch in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users With Linked Automatic Gain Controls
  31. Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression
  32. Adults are better than children at understanding cochlear-implant simulations, even after practice
  33. The aging brain compensates for distorted speech sounds
  34. The acoustics of cochlear-implant microphone placements
  35. Declines in degraded speech understanding from aging from a non-auditory source?
  36. Visual cues are helpful for cochlear-implant users hearing Spanish-accented English
  37. Effect of Stimulation Rate on Speech Understanding in Older Cochlear-Implant Users
  38. Does Distraction Affect Your Hearing?
  39. (Most) Kids with implants can attend to an ear, but cannot understand speech very well in noise
  40. Impact of Aging and the Electrode-to-Neural Interface on Temporal Processing Ability in Cochlear-Implant Users: Amplitude-Modulation Detection Thresholds
  41. Impact of Aging and the Electrode-to-Neural Interface on Temporal Processing Ability in Cochlear-Implant Users: Gap Detection Thresholds
  42. Speech perception with cochlear implants may differ between the sexes
  43. Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners
  44. It is difficult to ignore the acoustic ear for single-sided-deafness cochlear-implant users
  45. The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing
  46. Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners
  47. How to remove frequencies from a cochlear implant to improve spatial hearing
  48. Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants
  49. The perils of across-ear pitch matching: 2/3s of pitch isn't pitch
  50. Age-Related Temporal Processing Deficits in Word Segments in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
  51. Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence
  52. Don't confuse bad memory and mishearing: Cochlear implants do not reduce memory of numbers
  53. Newly observed frequency dependence for across-ear level difference processing
  54. Older listeners repair noisy cochlear-implant processed speech better than younger listeners
  55. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking
  56. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners’ Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences
  57. Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users
  58. Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners
  59. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users
  60. Cochlear-implant users adjust to speaking rate better than people with typical hearing
  61. Adults and children learn cochlear-implant-simulated speech perception at the same rate
  62. Effects of Stimulus Duration on Event-Related Potentials Recorded From Cochlear-Implant Users
  63. The Relationship Between Intensity Coding and Binaural Sensitivity in Adults With Cochlear Implants
  64. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners
  65. Aging reduces ability to perceive certain speech cues in cochlear-implant simulations
  66. Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids
  67. (Most) Cochlear implantees can attend to an ear, but cannot understand speech very well in noise
  68. Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants
  69. Having Two Ears Facilitates the Perceptual Separation of Concurrent Talkers for Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implantees
  70. Naive listeners can have difficulty in basic binaural hearing tasks
  71. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: Effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness
  72. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users
  73. Careful loudness balancing does not center sounds in the head of cochlear-implant users
  74. Effects of Interaural Pitch Matching and Auditory Image Centering on Binaural Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Users
  75. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners
  76. Internalized elevation perception of simple stimuli in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners
  77. The Effect of Interaural Fluctuation Rate on Correlation Change Discrimination
  78. Interaural mismatch causes poor spatial hearing and fusion across ears
  79. The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation
  80. The effect of an additional reflection in a precedence effect experiment
  81. Studies on Bilateral Cochlear Implants at the University of Wisconsin Binaural Hearing and Speech Lab
  82. Two-Dimensional Localization of Virtual Sound Sources in Cochlear-Implant Listeners
  83. 3-D localization of virtual sound sources: Effects of visual environment, pointing method, and training
  84. Median-plane sound localization as a function of the number of spectral channels using a channel vocoder
  85. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural time differences at high modulation rates by introducing temporal jitter
  86. Current-level discrimination and spectral profile analysis in multi-channel electrical stimulation
  87. Effects of upper-frequency boundary and spectral warping on speech intelligibility in electrical stimulation
  88. Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models
  89. Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. II. Brief duration noises
  90. Enhancing and unmasking the harmonics of a complex tone
  91. Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: Bandwidth effects
  92. Unmasking the harmonics of a complex tone