All Stories

  1. The contribution of facial recognition technology to wrongful arrests and trauma.
  2. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects
  3. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
  4. The role of suspect development practices in eyewitness identification accuracy and racial disparities in wrongful conviction
  5. Eyewitness Identification
  6. Prosecutorial Misconduct
  7. Potential causes of racial disparities in wrongful convictions based on mistaken identifications: Own-race bias and differences in evidence-based suspicion.
  8. Diversifying the bench: A commentary on Berryessa, Dror, and McCormack (2022)
  9. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
  10. Evidence strength (insufficiently) affects police officers’ decisions to place a suspect in a lineup.
  11. Diversity’s Impact on the Quality of Deliberations
  12. Diversity Will Benefit Eyewitness Science
  13. Eyewitness Identification in Its Social Context
  14. Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony.
  15. Improving Eyewitness-Identification Evidence Through Double-Blind Lineup Administration
  16. Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony
  17. Recommendations for Collecting Eyewitness Identification Evidence
  18. Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System: Prevalence, Causes, and a Search for Solutions
  19. Variations in reliability and validity do not influence judge, attorney, and mock juror decisions about psychological expert evidence.
  20. Exposure to capital voir dire may not increase convictions despite increasing pretrial presumption of guilt.
  21. Viewing videotaped identification procedure increases juror sensitivity to single-blind photo-array administration.
  22. Lineup administrator influence on eyewitness accuracy
  23. The case for double-blind lineup administration
  24. The psychology of juries.
  25. Introduction: An overview.
  26. Identifying Juror Bias: Moving from Assessment and Prediction to a New Generation of Jury Selection Research
  27. A Demonstrative Helps Opposing Expert Testimony Sensitize Jurors to the Validity of Scientific Evidence
  28. The Effects of Lineup Administrator Influence and Mortality Salience on Witness Identification Accuracy
  29. Cross-examination educates jurors about missing control groups in scientific evidence.
  30. Expert Testimony
  31. Hypothesis testing in attorney-conducted voir dire.
  32. Evaluation for Jury Selection
  33. The Legal Context
  34. Report Writing
  35. Conducting Community Surveys
  36. Consultation During Voir Dire
  37. Empirical Foundations and Limits
  38. Measuring Potential Predictors of Verdict
  39. Forensic Personality and Social Psychology
  40. Do jurors get what they expect? Traditional versus alternative forms of children's testimony
  41. Expert Psychological Testimony
  42. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
  43. Systematic Jury Selection
  44. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
  45. Interpretation
  46. Data Collection
  47. The Legal Context
  48. Empirical Foundations and Limits
  49. Key Concepts in Eyewitness Identification
  50. Preparation for the Evaluation
  51. Report Writing and Testimony
  52. The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case
  53. Can jurors recognize missing control groups, confounds, and experimenter bias in psychological science?
  54. Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification.
  55. Psychological mediators of the effects of opposing expert testimony on juror decisions.
  56. Juror Need for Cognition and Sensitivity to Methodological Flaws in Expert Evidence1
  57. Introduction to commentaries on the Illinois Pilot Study of lineup reforms.
  58. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
  59. Estimating the effects of misleading information on witness accuracy: can experts tell jurors something they don't already know?
  60. The Effects of Attribution of Responsibility and Work History on Perceptions of Reasonable Accommodations.
  61. Can the Truth Be Captured?
  62. Psychology, law, and the workplace: An overview and introduction to the special issue.
  63. The effects of British and American trial procedures on the quality of juror decision-making.
  64. Children, Social Science, and the Law
  65. Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases.
  66. Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases.
  67. Compelled mental health examinations, liability decisions, and damage awards in sexual harrassment cases: Issues for jury research.
  68. Compelled mental health examinations, liability decisions, and damage awards in sexual harrassment cases: Issues for jury research.
  69. The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: An examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms.
  70. Expert Testimony
  71. The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers?
  72. The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers?
  73. Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias.
  74. Reasoning about scientific evidence: Effects of juror gender and evidence quality on juror decisions in a hostile work environment case.
  75. Expert testimony in child sexual abuse trials: the admissibility of psychological science
  76. Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis.
  77. Identification of computer-generated facial composites.
  78. Identification of computer-generated facial composites.
  79. Private Reactions to Public Transgressions: Predictors of Evaluative Responses to Allegations of Political Misconduct
  80. Lust and Avarice in Politics
  81. Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: Effects of expert evidence type and cross-examination.
  82. Do child sexual abuse experts hold pro-child beliefs?: A survey of the international society for traumatic stress studies
  83. Do child sexual abuse experts hold pro-child beliefs?: A survey of the international society for traumatic stress studies
  84. Recent Developments in North American Identification Science and Practice
  85. Pretrial Publicity: Effects, Remedies, and Judicial Knowledge
  86. Implications of Automatic and Controlled Processes in Stereotyping for Hate Crime Perpetration and Litigation Margaret Bull Kovera
  87. Children, Social Science, and the Law: An Introduction to the Issues
  88. The Status of Evidentiary and Procedural Innovations in Child Abuse Proceedings