What is it about?
Much of what we know about the effects of various disease conditions involving skeletal muscle dysfunction and of the effects of putative therapeutic procedures and agents is gathered from analyses of muscle tissue samples. However the quantitative information gathered from such material is subject to some distortion and bias arising from the methods used for analysis and with their interaction with the polarized structure of muscle tissue. This article addresses some of the major concerns and suggests ways of removing or minimizing their ill-effects on interpretation of such data.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The aim of using information from data gathered in experimental animal models to improve our understanding of human disease requires some common reference points. For histological and cell biological analyses of tissues, such common reference points are only rarely established. The complex and highly polarized structure skeletal of muscle makes it an especially blatant example, where information must be interpreted with due caution when applied between species where differences in size, metabolism and lifestyle can have major influences. In this article it is proposed that data should be gathered in such a way as sy minimize minimize technical bias and to standardize, where possible, to reference denominators that common to the experimental system and to the system of basic interest, commonly Homo sapiens.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data, Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases, November 2021, IOS Press,
DOI: 10.3233/jnd-210736.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page